Textbook treatments and students' understanding of acceleration

Gloria Dall'Alba, Eleanor Walsh, John Bowden, Elaine Martin, Geoff N Masters, Paul Ramsden, Andrew Stephanou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A single science textbook often provides the syllabus for courses at upper secondary and tertiary levels, and may be used as a principal source of information or explanation. The research reported in this article challenges such practices. The ways in which the concept, acceleration, is treated in physics textbooks is compared with understandings of the concept demonstrated by final-year secondary (Year 12) and first-year university students. Some students’ understandings are shown to be incomplete in ways that parallel misleading or inaccurate textbook treatments of the concept. In addition to misleading or inaccurate statements, the limitations of some textbook treatments of acceleration were found to include: lack of attempts to make explicit relationships with other concepts, failure to point out when it is appropriate to use particular definitions or that an alternative definition might be more appropriate in specific situations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Research in Science Teaching
Volume30
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - Sept 1993
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acceleration
  • Education
  • First year students
  • Gravity
  • Misconceptions
  • Physics
  • Science
  • Scientific concepts
  • Secondary school science
  • Teaching
  • Textbook content
  • Universities
  • Year 12

Disciplines

  • Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research

Cite this