Non-Cognitive Attributes: Measurement and Meaning

Mary Ainley, John Ainley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the development of motivational constructs that have been used in international comparative studies of reading, mathematics, and science. Their chapter pays particular attention to the achievement paradox first observed in Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), in which the average level of achievement of a country is negatively related to the average level of interest in a subject; whereas, within countries, the relationship between interest and achievement is positive. Attempts to explain this paradox by examining biases in student reporting on the various attitude and achievement scales were unsuccessful. The chapter proposes that cultural differences in the conception of attitudes explain the paradox. Cultural values provide a context within which students develop attitudes to schooling domains. This is exemplified in the degree to which science and technology have been adopted and are embedded in the culture and reflected in access to science-relevant learning opportunities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Sage Handbook of Comparative Studies in Education
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Academic achievement
  • Cultural differences
  • International comparisons
  • Measurement
  • Non-cognitive attributes
  • Student attitudes

Disciplines

  • Educational Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology

Cite this