Next-generation environments for assessing and promoting complex science learning

Edys S. Quellmalz; Jodi L. Davenport; Michael J. Timms; George E. DeBoer; Kevin A. Jordan; Chun-Wei Huang; Barbara C. Buckley

doi:10.1037/a0032220

Next-generation environments for assessing and promoting complex science learning

Edys S. Quellmalz, Jodi L. Davenport, Michael J. Timms, George E. DeBoer, Kevin A. Jordan, Chun-Wei Huang, Barbara C. Buckley

Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Educational Psychology
Volume	105
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032220
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2013

Disciplines

Psychology

Access to Document

10.1037/a0032220Licence: Unspecified

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1054440

Cite this

@article{6eeb899b342c46f2b0f7ea771671d320,

title = "Next-generation environments for assessing and promoting complex science learning",

author = "Quellmalz, \{Edys S.\} and Davenport, \{Jodi L.\} and Timms, \{Michael J.\} and DeBoer, \{George E.\} and Jordan, \{Kevin A.\} and Chun-Wei Huang and Buckley, \{Barbara C.\}",

note = "How can assessments measure complex science learning? Although traditional, multiple-choice items can effectively measure declarative knowledge such as scientific facts or definitions, they are considered less well suited for providing evidence of science inquiry practices such as making observations or designing and conducting investigations.",

year = "2013",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1037/a0032220",

language = "English",

volume = "105",

journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Next-generation environments for assessing and promoting complex science learning

AU - Quellmalz, Edys S.

AU - Davenport, Jodi L.

AU - Timms, Michael J.

AU - DeBoer, George E.

AU - Jordan, Kevin A.

AU - Huang, Chun-Wei

AU - Buckley, Barbara C.

N1 - How can assessments measure complex science learning? Although traditional, multiple-choice items can effectively measure declarative knowledge such as scientific facts or definitions, they are considered less well suited for providing evidence of science inquiry practices such as making observations or designing and conducting investigations.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

U2 - 10.1037/a0032220

DO - 10.1037/a0032220

M3 - Article

VL - 105

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

IS - 4

ER -