Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University

Catherine A McClellan; John R Donoghue

Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University

Catherine A McClellan, John R Donoghue

Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER)

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

 This paper examines investigation of the TEAM instrument, including analyses of the 2011-2012
 data. This report summarizes three sets of activities. The first is a set of analyses evaluating the
 differences, if any, between scores from announced and unannounced teacher observations. The
 second set of tasks is geared at recommending the possible simplification of the TEAM rubrics
 through analyses and expert judgment. [Abstract taken from Executive Summary]

Original language	English
Publication status	Published - Oct 2013

Keywords

Evaluation
System evaluation
TEAM Rubric
Teacher observations
Teaching practice

Disciplines

Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research

Access to Document

http://www.clowderconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/TN-Final-Report_09_03_2013-draft10_16_13v2.pdf

Cite this

@misc{4c5247f8350740f0941a665076b5fb74,

title = "Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University",

abstract = " This paper examines investigation of the TEAM instrument, including analyses of the 2011-2012 data. This report summarizes three sets of activities. The first is a set of analyses evaluating the differences, if any, between scores from announced and unannounced teacher observations. The second set of tasks is geared at recommending the possible simplification of the TEAM rubrics through analyses and expert judgment. [Abstract taken from Executive Summary]",

keywords = "Evaluation, System evaluation, TEAM Rubric, Teacher observations, Teaching practice",

author = "McClellan, {Catherine A} and Donoghue, {John R}",

year = "2013",

month = oct,

language = "English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University

AU - McClellan, Catherine A

AU - Donoghue, John R

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - This paper examines investigation of the TEAM instrument, including analyses of the 2011-2012 data. This report summarizes three sets of activities. The first is a set of analyses evaluating the differences, if any, between scores from announced and unannounced teacher observations. The second set of tasks is geared at recommending the possible simplification of the TEAM rubrics through analyses and expert judgment. [Abstract taken from Executive Summary]

AB - This paper examines investigation of the TEAM instrument, including analyses of the 2011-2012 data. This report summarizes three sets of activities. The first is a set of analyses evaluating the differences, if any, between scores from announced and unannounced teacher observations. The second set of tasks is geared at recommending the possible simplification of the TEAM rubrics through analyses and expert judgment. [Abstract taken from Executive Summary]

KW - Evaluation

KW - System evaluation

KW - TEAM Rubric

KW - Teacher observations

KW - Teaching practice

M3 - Other contribution

ER -